Statistically Speaking
RICE SELF-SUFFICIENCY OR RICE SECURITY?
SOME STATISTICS ON RICE AND EXPORTS ![]()
by Dr. Romulo A. Virola 1
Secretary General, NSCB
Two things envisioned in the State of the Nation Address delivered by Pres. Aquino last 25 July are: “First, an end to over-importation that only serves to benefit the selfish few. Second: we want rice self-sufficiency – that the rice served on every Filipino’s dinner table is planted here, harvested here, and purchased here.”
About twenty years ago, 1992 to be exact, we were a net exporter of rice. With a population of 65.34 million2 in 1992 and rice utilization per capita of 87.13 kgs per capita per year or 238.71 grams per capita per day, we needed about 5.7 million metric tons of rice. We produced 5.97 million metric tons and exported 35,101 metric tons. Rice3 cost Ph Pesos 10.25 per kilo in the NCR in 1992, about 8.7 % of the minimum wage of Ph Pesos 118 for non-agriculture workers. Palay prices4 in Region 35 were at Ph Pesos 4.91 or 4.4 % of the minimum wage of Ph Pesos 111.006.
Since 1993 we have been a net importer of rice. In 2010, we had a population of 93.87 million7 and rice utilization per capita of 112.76 kgs per year or 308.93 grams8 per capita per day for a national requirement of 10.59 million metric tons of rice. We produced only 10.32 metric tons and imported 2.4 million metric tons. Rice cost Ph Pesos 30.00 per kilo in NCR, about 8 % of the average minimum wage of Ph Pesos 374.509 last year. For the same year, the farmers of Region 3 got Ph Pesos 15.48 or 5.6 % of the minimum wage of Ph Pesos 276.50.10 Were our rice farmers and the rice eaters better off in 1992 or in 2010? Do we now strive for food security or do we target to be self-sufficient in rice? (Tables 1 & 2 )
As we all know, rice is the staple food of Juan dela Cruz. In the 70s and the 80s and as late as 1992, we were self-sufficient in rice. But so much hectarage that used to be planted to rice had given way to subdivisions, commercial and industrial establishments, and golf courses. For economic development? For world-class Pinoy golfers? So far, it looks like the Koreans and the Taiwanese have benefitted more from these land conversion decisions as golfers from the two countries are now doing very well in the professional golf tours. Some say, the agrarian reform has not been all that good either. It is therefore not surprising that from 1993 to 2011, we depended on rice importation to secure our food needs. We are not agriculturists; and we do not have Ph.Ds in economics, but our gut feel is that self-sufficiency in our staple food is the better development strategy. Rice is of course, very important to our poor11 kababayan, who spent 32% of their total food expenditure in 2006 on rice. And certainly, we do not want to suffer once again from the rice crisis that hit us in 2008, regardless of whether it was a rice price crisis or a food crisis. According to Wikipedia12, there were dramatic increases in world food prices in 2007 and the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2008, “creating a global crisis and causing political and economical instability and social unrest in both poor and developed countries”. It may be recalled that farmers and fishermen comprise the two poorest sectors13 of Philippine society and so a rice crisis whether on the supply or demand side will have serious repercussions to the well-being of our people. Indeed, rice is a critical commodity in our country and our leaders should recognize that possibly far more important than economic efficiency whose benefits do not necessarily trickle down to the poor, is preventing our social volcano from becoming restive. In fact, even before the social unrests in the Middle East and North Africa, there has been increasing worldwide recognition for alternative/supplementary measures of progress of societies like Gross National Happiness14 to go with GDP/GNP15.
This rainy month of August, Statistically Speaking focuses on some statistics on rice and exports, hopefully to help our planners and decision makers. Aside from those already cited, here are more:
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), in 2008, the Philippines with 16.82 million tonnes was the 8th top producer of rice16 in the world, but 5th among the ASEAN countries. We were behind China (193.35 million tonnes) , India (148.77 million tonnes), Indonesia (60.25 million tonnes), Bangladesh (46.74 million tonnes), Vietnam (38.73 million tonnes), Myanmar (32.57 million tonnes), and Thailand (31.65 million tonnes). Completing the top ten are Brazil (12.06 million tonnes) and Japan (11.03 million tonnes). The Philippine position has been fairly steady at 5th among the ASEAN countries since 1970s, but our global position has improved from 10th in 1970 to 8th since 2000. (Tables 3A and 3B)
But FAO data also say that despite our being world’s 8th top producer of rice17 in 2008, we were the world’s top importer of rice, followed by United Arab Emirates, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Iraq, South Africa, Cote d’Ivoire, and the United States of America. Whether it is good for our health, we do not know, but we obviously love rice. No wonder Mang Inasal and Chic-Boy are such big hits with their unlimited rice promos. Must be good business for the Dr. Belos and the Dr. Calayans too. (Tables 4A and 4B)
The world’s top exporters of rice18 in 2008 were Thailand, (8.67 million tons), Vietnam (4.74 million tons), Pakistan (2.60 million tonnes), India (2.47 million tonnes) and the United States of America (1.71 million tonnes). Others in the top ten are China (0.81 million tonnes), Italy (0.62 million tonnes), United Arab Emirates (0.52 million tonnes), Uruguay (0.50 million tonnes), and Brazil (0.32 million tonnes). (Tables 5A and 5B)
And despite the presence of IRRI and UP Los Banos, our rice19 yield per hectare stood at only 37.70 hectograms in 2008 and which ranks 50th among 115 countries and 4th in the ASEAN. We can learn lessons from the high yields in 1st Egypt (97.31 Hg), 2nd Australia (95.00 Hg), 3rd El Salvador (79.37 Hg), 4th Uruguay (79.02 Hg), and 5th United States (76.73 Hg). We can also find out why some of our ASEAN neighbors do better: 24th Vietnam (52.28 Hg), 30th Indonesia (48.95 Hg), and 44th Myanmar (40.32 Hg). (Tables 6A and 6B)
Curiously, in terms of yield per hectare, we are doing better than a major competitor, Thailand, with 29.62 hectograms, although Thailand is the world’s 5th largest rice producer and the top rice exporter. (Table 6B)
While area harvested to rice has increased from 3.20 million hectares in 1970 to 3.50 million has. in 1980 to 4.46 million has. in 2008, the other ASEAN countries have likewise increased their areas harvested to rice except Brunei and Malaysia. Thus, the Philippines continues to have only the 5th largest area harvested to rice while Thailand with 10.68 million hectares, ranks 2nd to Indonesia with 12.31 million hectares. This explains why Thailand despite its lower yield per hectare produces more rice than the Philippines. (Tables 7A and 7B)
What about our exports?
Exports of course comprise a very important sector of the economy. They provide employment and generate foreign currency needed to finance import requirements. In 2010, exports of goods amounted to Ph Pesos 2.26 trillion or 25.1% of total GDP, while exports of services amounted to Ph Pesos 874 billion or 9.7 % of GDP. (Table 8) 
Philippine exports have changed dramatically in the last 20 years as our export revolution shifted “From Coconut Chips to Microchips”.20 In the 60s, our top merchandise exports included plywood, logs, centrifugal sugar, copper concentrates, and crude coconut oil. In the 70s, plywood was replaced by garments. Starting in the 80s, semiconductors and electronic microcircuits became our top export, together with garments and crude coconut oil. In the 90s, our top exports were semiconductors and electronic microcircuits, finished electrical machinery, garments, and ignition wiring sets. Starting 2008, they were joined by cathodes & sections of cathodes of refined copper. In 2010, using a new classification system under the overall revised PSNA series21, the top merchandise exports were components/Devices (Semiconductors), Electronic Data Processing, Articles of Apparel and Clothing Accessories, Coconut Oil, and Ignition wiring sets. In current prices, electronic components accounted for 62 percent of the total exports of goods of the Philippines with the principal agricultural products limited to a share of 4.3% (Table 9)
And yes, the Philippines has become a leading global supplier of integrated circuits and electronic components, ranking 10th in 2009 with a share of 3.1 percent in the world22.
What has happened to our agricultural products? Our luscious mangoes from Zambales and Guimaras? Our virgin coconut oil? Our bananas, our pin
eapple? If one goes by the Value of Exports, truly, integrated circuits and electronic components are tops. But in terms of Value Added, our agriculture products provide much higher contributions. While the electronic products have Value Added of at most 40% of Output, our Agriculture products contribute at least 65%! (Table 10)
The question therefore is, are our export strategies correct? We statisticians do not have the answer but we hope our questions will help.
And how do we compare with our ASEAN neighbors? 
In terms of share of the world export market, the Philippines ranked fifth among the ASEAN countries from 2000 to 2008, behind Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and Indonesia. Yes, we are kulelat among the original ASEAN member states. Worse, in 2009, we were overtaken by Vietnam. (Table 11)
What about the countries where our exports go?
The United States of America and Japan have consistently been the top two destinations of our exports since 1995. From 1995 to 1998, they had a share of about 50% of our exports but this has gone down over the years: 45% in 2000, 36% in 2005 and 30% in 2010. In recent years, the other top destinations of our exports are People’s Republic of China, Hongkong and the Netherlands, although Singapore came in third in 2010. The tsunami in Japan and the Standard & Poor’s unprecedented downgrade of the US will therefore not affect us as much as they would have in the earlier years when our exports were less diversified by country of destination. (Table 12)
Can we achieve the vision of the last SONA? Despite the bad news coming from the statistics, there is really no reason why not! After all, we have been there before! But we have to work hard and we have to have the will to walk our talk. We also need to cooperate with one another and rally around this vision!
May we have less typhoons this year!
Reactions and views are welcome thru email to the author at ra.virola@nscb.gov.ph
_______________
1 Secretary General of the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) and Chairman of the Statistical Research and Training Center (SRTC). He holds a Ph. D. in Statistics from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, U.S.A. and has taught mathematics and statistics at the University of the Philippines. He is also a past president of the Philippine Statistical Association. This article was co-written by Mark C. Pascasio, Statistical Coordination Officer I, of the NSCB. The authors thank Jessamyn O. Encarnacion, Noel S. Nepomuceno, Mechelle Viernes, Gerald Junne Clarino, Priscille C. Villanueva, Ma. Libertie V. Masculino, Albert Garcia, Andrea Baylon, and Edgard E. Enrado for the assistance in the preparation of the article. The views expressed in the article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NSCB.
2 Using the 1990 Census-based population projections
3 Regular milled rice. Source: CountrySTAT Philippines, Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS).
4 Farmgate prices for Palay Other Variety, dry. Source: CountrySTAT Philippines, BAS.
5 The top rice producer among the 17 regions of the Philippines
6 Average of the range under WO 02 dated 2 July 1991.
7 Using the 1990 Census-based population projections. The population estimate for 2010 is 94.01 million using the 2000 Census-based population projections
8 For purposes of poverty monitoring, the average requirement per capita per day is 360 grams. From the 2008 National Nutrition Survey of the Food and Nutrition Research Institute, the mean one-day per capita food consumption on rice and rice products was 317 grams.
9 Average of the ranges under WO 14 and WO 15, dated 28 Aug 2008 and 1 July 2010, respectively.
10 Average of the range under WO 14 dated 16 June 2008.
11 The bottom 30% of the 2006 (FIES) income distribution. The 2009 FIES Public Use Files provided to the NSCB by the NSO does not have the details to allow an update of this parameter. See Statistically Speaking article (http://www.nscb.gov.ph/headlines/StatsSpeak/2009/091409_rav_bbb_food.asp)
12 Wikipedia. (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007%E2%80%932008_world_food_price_crisis)
13 See Statistically Speaking article Table 9: http://www.nscb.gov.ph/headlines/StatsSpeak/2011/071111_rav.asp
14 The NSCB started work on the Philippine Happiness Index (PHI) in 2007. See Statistically Speaking articles (http://www.nscb.gov.ph/headlines/StatsSpeak/2010/110810_rav_joe_happiness.asp, http://www.nscb.gov.ph/headlines/StatsSpeak/2007/100807_rav_happiness2.asp and http://www.nscb.gov.ph/headlines/StatsSpeak/2007/081307_rav_happiness.asp) and papers during the 10th and 11th National Convention on Statistics (http://www.nscb.gov.ph/ncs/10thNCS/papers/invited%20papers/ips-28/ips28-03.pdf and http://www.nscb.gov.ph/ncs/11thNCS/papers/invited%20papers/ips23/01_Measuring%20Progress %20of%20Philippine%20Society%20What%20Makes%20the%20Poor%20Happy.pdf).
15 Gross National Income (GNI) is now used in lieu of GNP, per recommendation of the 1993/2008 SNA.
16 Rice, paddy
17 Rice milled, which is different from the classification 042 under the Philippine Standard Commodity Classification used by the NSO in generating Foreign Trade Statistics. Code 042 includes rice in the husk (paddy or rough rice), rice semi-milled or wholly-milled, rice husked but not further prepared.
18 Rice milled
19 Rice, paddy
20 Ernie Santiago. The Philippine ICT Industry. ITA Symposium. Geneva. 28 March 2007http://search.wto.org/search?q=role+of+exports+in+the+philippines&site=English_website&btnG=Search&entqr=0&output=xml_no_dtd&sort=date%3AD%3AL%3Ad1&client=english_frontend&numgm=5&ud=1&oe=ISO-8859-1&ie=ISO-8859-1&proxystylesheet=english_frontend&proxyreload=1
21 The overall revised and 2000-rebased PSNA series for 1998-2010 was released last 12 May 2011 for the annual series and 30 May 2011 for the quarterly series.
22 World Trade Organization, International Trade Statistics 2010
Table 1. Philippine Rice Imports/Exports
Unit: in metric tons; PSCC code: 042
| Year | Imports | Exports |
| 1984 | * | 1 |
| 1985 | * | - |
| 1986 | * | - |
| 1987 | * | 112,000 |
| 1988 | * | - |
| 1989 | * | 16,000 |
| 1990 | * | - |
| 1991 | 61 | 10,009 |
| 1992 | 636 | 35,101 |
| 1993 | 203,943 | 1 |
| 1994 | 169 | no exportation |
| 1995 | 264,155 | no exportation |
| 1996 | 866,881 | no exportation |
| 1997 | 724,880 | - |
| 1998 | 2,178,135 | 44 |
| 1999 | 838,071 | 323 |
| 2000 | 642,294 | 323 |
| 2001 | 810,903 | 13 |
| 2002 | 1,200,587 | 2 |
| 2003 | 888,984 | 16 |
| 2004 | 1,003,401 | 987 |
| 2005 | 1,829,604 | 34 |
| 2006 | 1,723,277 | 90 |
| 2007 | 1,809,828 | 281 |
| 2008 | 2,438,932 | 1,199 |
| 2009 | 1,784,141 | 198 |
| 2010 | 2,386,217 | 1,309 |
Notes:
- less than '000 MT
* no electronic copies of the data are availableSources:
Foreign Trade Statistics, National Statistics Office;
Philippine Statistical Yearbook, National Statistical Coordination Board042 includes rice in the husk (paddy or rough rice), rice semi-milled or wholly-milled, rice husked but not further prepared.
Table 2. Rice Supply and Utilization Account by Year
| Year | SU Production (in thousand metric tons) |
UT Per Capita (in kg/yr) |
UT Per Capita (in gm/day) |
| 1990 | 6095 | 92.53 | 253.51 |
| 1991 | 6326 | 83.71 | 229.34 |
| 1992 | 5970 | 87.13 | 238.71 |
| 1993 | 6170 | 88.52 | 242.52 |
| 1994 | 6892 | 86.49 | 236.96 |
| 1995 | 6894 | 92.55 | 253.56 |
| 1996 | 7379 | 98.73 | 270.49 |
| 1997 | 7370 | 97.05 | 265.89 |
| 1998 | 5595 | 91.91 | 251.81 |
| 1999 | 7708 | 99.68 | 273.10 |
| 2000 | 8103 | 103.16 | 282.63 |
| 2001 | 8472 | 103.77 | 284.30 |
| 2002 | 8679 | 108.03 | 295.97 |
| 2003 | 8829 | 107.02 | 293.21 |
| 2004 | 9481 | 116.09 | 318.05 |
| 2005 | 9550 | 118.80 | 325.48 |
| 2006 | 10024 | 118.70 | 325.21 |
| 2007 | 10621 | 126.24 | 345.86 |
| 2008 | 10997 | 128.10 | 350.96 |
| 2009 | 10633 | 119.92 | 328.55 |
| 2010 | 10315 | 112.76 | 308.93 |
SU - Supply
UT - UtilizationSource: Bureau of Agricultural Statistics http://countrystat.bas.gov.ph/selection.asp
Table 3A. 2008 Top 10 World Producers of Rice, paddy
| Country | 2008 (in tonnes) |
Rank |
| China | 193,354,180 | 1 |
| India | 148,770,000 | 2 |
| Indonesia | 60,251,100 | 3 |
| Bangladesh | 46,742,000 | 4 |
| Viet Nam | 38,725,100 | 5 |
| Myanmar | 32,573,000 | 6 |
| Thailand | 31,650,600 | 7 |
| Philippines | 16,815,500 | 8 |
| Brazil | 12,061,500 | 9 |
| Japan | 11,028,800 | 10 |
Table 3B. ASEAN Producers of Rice, paddy
| ASEAN Country |
1970 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 1980 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 1990 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2000 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2005 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2006 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2007 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2008 (in tonnes) |
Rank |
| Indonesia | 19,331,000 | 1 | 29,651,900 | 1 | 45,178,800 | 1 | 51,898,000 | 1 | 54,151,100 | 1 | 54,454,900 | 1 | 57,157,400 | 1 | 60,251,100 | 1 |
| Viet Nam | 10,173,300 | 3 | 11,647,400 | 4 | 19,225,100 | 2 | 32,529,500 | 2 | 35,832,900 | 2 | 35,849,500 | 2 | 35,942,700 | 2 | 38,725,100 | 2 |
| Myanmar | 8,161,900 | 4 | 13,317,400 | 3 | 13,971,800 | 4 | 21,323,900 | 4 | 27,683,000 | 4 | 30,924,000 | 3 | 31,451,000 | 4 | 32,573,000 | 3 |
| Thailand | 13,850,000 | 2 | 17,368,100 | 2 | 17,193,200 | 3 | 25,844,000 | 3 | 30,291,900 | 3 | 29,641,900 | 4 | 32,099,400 | 3 | 31,650,600 | 4 |
| Philippines | 5,578,410 | 5 | 7,646,490 | 5 | 9,885,000 | 5 | 12,389,400 | 5 | 14,603,000 | 5 | 15,326,700 | 5 | 16,240,200 | 5 | 16,815,500 | 5 |
| Cambodia | 3,814,000 | 6 | 1,717,000 | 7 | 2,500,000 | 6 | 4,026,090 | 6 | 5,986,200 | 6 | 6,264,120 | 6 | 6,727,000 | 6 | 7,175,470 | 6 |
| Lao People's Democratic Republic | 903,231 | 8 | 1,053,100 | 8 | 1,491,500 | 8 | 2,201,700 | 7 | 2,568,000 | 7 | 2,663,700 | 7 | 2,710,050 | 7 | 2,927,140 | 7 |
| Malaysia | 1,681,420 | 7 | 2,044,600 | 6 | 1,884,980 | 7 | 2,140,800 | 8 | 2,314,000 | 8 | 2,187,000 | 8 | 2,375,000 | 8 | 2,353,000 | 8 |
| Brunei Darussalam | 6,781 | 9 | 2,747 | 9 | 930 | 9 | 299 | 9 | 851 | 9 | 1,095 | 9 | 1,512 * | 9 | 1,402 * | 9 |
| Singapore |
* = Unofficial figure
[ ] = Official data
F = FAO estimate
Im = FAO data based on imputation methodology
M = Data not available
P = Provisional official data
Source: FAOSTAT | © FAO Statistics Division 2011 | 05 August 2011
Table 4A. 2008 Top 10 Importers of Rice Milled
| Country | 2008 (in tonnes) |
Rank | |
| Philippines | 2,500,000 | * | 1 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1,278,230 | 2 | |
| Iran (Islamic Republic of) | 1,125,050 | R | 3 |
| Saudi Arabia | 926,281 | R | 4 |
| Malaysia | 883,111 | * | 5 |
| Bangladesh | 781,168 | * | 6 |
| Iraq | 694,215 | R | 7 |
| South Africa | 626,429 | 8 | |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 547,909 | * | 9 |
| United States of America | 532,571 | 10 | |
Table 4B. ASEAN Importers of Rice Milled
| ASEAN Country |
1970 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 1980 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 1990 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2000 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2005 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2006 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2007 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2008 (in tonnes) |
Rank | ||||||||
| Philippines | - | - | 3 | 8 | 592,727 | 1 | 642,233 | 2 | 1,100,000 | * | 1 | 1,800,000 | * | 1 | 1,900,000 | * | 1 | 2,500,000 | * | 1 | ||||
| Malaysia | 280,658 | 3 | 118,476 | 5 | 312,803 | 2 | 568,596 | 3 | 563,387 | 2 | 605,095 | 2 | 600,138 | 3 | 883,111 | * | 2 | |||||||
| Singapore | 234,530 | 4 | 159,698 | 3 | 202,184 | 3 | 326,759 | 4 | 258,995 | 3 | 279,276 | 4 | 303,830 | * | 4 | 269,654 | 3 | |||||||
| Indonesia | 956,130 | 2 | 2,011,710 | 1 | 40,641 | 4 | 803,357 | 1 | 122,637 | 4 | 306,680 | 3 | 1,001,430 | 2 | 198,676 | 4 | ||||||||
| Myanmar | 5 | 8 | - | - | - | - | 10,000 | * | 8 | 2,096 | R | 8 | 10,500 | R | 7 | 3,149 | R | 8 | 81,000 | * | 5 | |||
| Brunei Darussalam | 10,883 | 6 | 15,914 | 6 | 30,000 | * | 5 | 40,000 | * | 5 | 33,308 | R | 5 | 33,635 | 5 | 31,765 | R | 5 | 33,096 | R | 6 | |||
| Lao People's Democratic Republic | 66,567 | 5 | 1,000 | 7 | 4,240 | 7 | 13,693 | * | 7 | 21,341 | * | 6 | 14,645 | * | 6 | 24,000 | * | 6 | 22,347 | * | 7 | |||
| Thailand | - | M | - | - | M | - | - | M | - | 524 | 9 | 1,520 | 9 | 1,445 | 9 | 2,775 | * | 9 | 13,029 | 8 | ||||
| Cambodia | 1,053 | 7 | 138,500 | F | 4 | 25,800 | 6 | 37,274 | 6 | 7,594 | R | 7 | 1,856 | R | 8 | 11,965 | * | 7 | 7,574 | * | 9 | |||
| Viet Nam | 1,260,000 | F | 1 | 201,400 | 2 | 1,900 | 8 | - | * | - | 340 | R | 10 | 575 | R | 10 | 2,080 | R | 10 | 683 | R | 10 | ||
* = Unofficial figure
[ ] = Official data
F = FAO estimate
Im = FAO data based on imputation methodology
M = Data not available
P = Provisional official data
Source: FAOSTAT | © FAO Statistics Division 2011 | 05 August 2011
Table 5A. 2008 Top 10 Exporters of Rice Milled
| Country | 2008 (in tonnes) |
Rank |
| Thailand | 8,672,450 | 1 |
| Viet Nam | 4,735,170 | 2 |
| Pakistan | 2,599,180 | 3 |
| India | 2,474,250 | 4 |
| United States of America | 1,705,760 | 5 |
| China | 809,316 | 6 |
| Italy | 621,162 | 7 |
| United Arab Emirates | 521,657 | 8 |
| Uruguay | 500,478 | 9 |
| Brazil | 319,454 | 10 |
Table 5B. ASEAN Exporters of Rice Milled
| ASEAN Country |
1970 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 1980 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 1990 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2000 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2005 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2006 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2007 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2008 (in tonnes) |
Rank | ||||||||
| Thailand | 1,047,460 | 1 | 2,762,920 | 1 | 3,557,820 | 1 | 5,282,160 | 1 | 6,043,550 | 1 | 5,996,420 | 1 | 7,408,300 | 1 | 8,672,450 | 1 | ||||||||
| Viet Nam | 18,479 | 5 | 33,300 | 4 | 1,624,000 | 2 | 3,476,980 | 2 | 5,250,000 | 2 | 4,642,000 | 2 | 4,558,000 | 2 | 4,735,170 | 2 | ||||||||
| Myanmar | 640,964 | 2 | 653,100 | 2 | 213,600 | 3 | 251,400 | 3 | 180,000 | 3 | 71,180 | R | 3 | 358,500 | 3 | 40,924 | R | 3 | ||||||
| Singapore | 33,859 | 4 | 13,342 | 5 | 1,964 | 4 | 4,105 | 5 | 82,239 | 4 | 67,070 | 4 | 74,872 | 4 | 13,607 | 4 | ||||||||
| Cambodia | 177,688 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 4,860 | 4 | 1,384 | R | 7 | 3,444 | R | 5 | 1,170 | R | 5 | 4,299 | R | 5 | ||||
| Philippines | - | - | 256,390 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 224 | 6 | 75 | R | 8 | 1,370 | R | 6 | 68 | R | 7 | 1,298 | R | 6 | ||||
| Malaysia | 70 | 6 | - | - | 57 | 5 | 63 | 8 | 1,531 | * | 6 | 1,157 | 7 | 54 | 8 | 860 | * | 7 | ||||||
| Indonesia | - | - | 10,003 | 6 | - | - | 196 | 7 | 42,280 | 5 | 907 | 8 | 336 | 6 | 429 | 8 | ||||||||
| Brunei Darussalam | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | F | - | - | F | - | 369 | R | 9 | - | * | - | 14 | R | 9 | |||
* = Unofficial figure
[ ] = Official data
F = FAO estimate
Im = FAO data based on imputation methodology
M = Data not available
P = Provisional official data
Source: FAOSTAT | © FAO Statistics Division 2011 | 05 August 2011
Table 6A. Rice yield per hectare, in hectogram per hectare.
| Country | Rice yield per hectare | Rank | Country | Rice yield per hectare | Rank | |
| 1970 | 2006 | |||||
| Puerto Rico | 65,714 | 1 | Egypt | 100,750 | 1 | |
| Australia | 62,274 | 2 | Australia | 98,282 | 2 | |
| Spain | 59,487 | 3 | United States of America | 77,312 | 3 | |
| Japan | 56,347 | 4 | Greece | 77,136 | 4 | |
| Egypt | 54,250 | 5 | El Salvador | 73,941 | 5 | |
| 1980 | 2007 | |||||
| Puerto Rico | 87,878 | 1 | Egypt | 97,674 | 1 | |
| Spain | 63,333 | 2 | Australia | 81,500 | 2 | |
| Egypt | 58,331 | 3 | United States of America | 80,917 | 3 | |
| Italy | 54,955 | 4 | Uruguay | 78,796 | 4 | |
| Australia | 52,697 | 5 | Greece | 76,337 | 5 | |
| 1990 | 2008 | |||||
| Swaziland | 91,491 | 1 | Egypt | 97,309 | 1 | |
| Australia | 88,000 | 2 | Australia | 95,000 | 2 | |
| Egypt | 72,662 | 3 | El Salvador | 79,373 | 3 | |
| Mauritius | 63,333 | 4 | Uruguay | 79,025 | 4 | |
| Japan | 63,278 | 5 | United States of America | 76,730 | 5 | |
| 2000 | 2009 | |||||
| Egypt | 91,024 | 1 | Egypt | 100,000 | 1 | |
| Australia | 82,573 | 2 | Australia | 90,000 | 2 | |
| Spain | 70,660 | 3 | United States of America | 79,412 | 3 | |
| United States of America | 70,397 | 4 | Turkey | 77,767 | 4 | |
| Greece | 70,000 | 5 | Rwanda | 76,959 | 5 | |
| 2005 | ||||||
| Egypt | 99,874 | 1 | ||||
| United States of America | 74,244 | 2 | ||||
| Greece | 72,401 | 3 | ||||
| El Salvador | 72,117 | 4 | ||||
| Turkey | 70,588 | 5 |
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor
Table 6B. Rice yield per hectare, ASEAN
| ASEAN Country |
1970 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | 1980 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | 1990 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | 2000 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | 2005 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | 2006 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | 2007 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | 2008 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | 2009 (in Hg/Ha) |
Rank | |||||||||
| Viet Nam | 21,533 | Fc | 3 | 20,798 | Fc | 5 | 31,814 | Fc | 2 | 42,431 | Fc | 2 | 48,890 | Fc | 1 | 48,942 | Fc | 1 | 49,869 | Fc | 1 | 52,230 | Fc | 1 | 52278 | Fc | 1 |
| Indonesia | 23,762 | Fc | 2 | 32,928 | Fc | 1 | 43,017 | Fc | 1 | 44,007 | Fc | 1 | 45,739 | Fc | 2 | 46,201 | Fc | 2 | 47,052 | Fc | 2 | 48,948 | Fc | 2 | 49985 | Fc | 2 |
| Myanmar | 16,973 | Fc | 7 | 27,739 | Fc | 3 | 29,352 | Fc | 4 | 33,834 | Fc | 3 | 37,490 | Fc | 3 | 38,300 | Fc | 3 | 39,259 | Fc | 3 | 40,323 | Fc | 3 | 40852 | Fc | 3 |
| Philippines | 17,459 | Fc | 6 | 22,105 | Fc | 4 | 29,785 | Fc | 3 | 30,681 | Fc | 4 | 35,875 | Fc | 4 | 36,843 | Fc | 4 | 38,007 | Fc | 4 | 37,703 | Fc | 4 | 35889 | Fc | 6 |
| Malaysia | 23,857 | Fc | 1 | 28,524 | Fc | 2 | 27,693 | Fc | 5 | 30,639 | Fc | 5 | 34,220 | Fc | 6 | 33,906 | Fc | 5 | 35,277 | Fc | 5 | 35,865 | Fc | 5 | 37334 | Fc | 4 |
| Lao People's Democratic Republic | 13,588 | Fc | 9 | 14,385 | Fc | 7 | 22,935 | Fc | 6 | 30,605 | Fc | 6 | 34,890 | Fc | 5 | 33,482 | Fc | 6 | 34,688 | Fc | 6 | 35,465 | Fc | 6 | 36027 | Fc | 5 |
| Thailand | 20,207 | Fc | 4 | 18,878 | Fc | 6 | 19,555 | Fc | 7 | 26,128 | Fc | 7 | 29,625 | Fc | 7 | 29,160 | Fc | 7 | 30,086 | Fc | 7 | 29,625 | Fc | 7 | 28698 | Fc | 7 |
| Cambodia | 15,898 | Fc | 8 | 11,923 | Fc | 9 | 13,477 | Fc | 9 | 21,154 | Fc | 8 | 24,792 | Fc | 8 | 24,892 | Fc | 8 | 26,215 | Fc | 8 | 27,456 | Fc | 8 | 28358 | Fc | 8 |
| Brunei Darussalam | 19,620 | Fc | 5 | 13,797 | Fc | 8 | 15,500 | Fc | 8 | 6,500 | Fc | 9 | 8,728 | Fc | 9 | 12,234 | Fc | 9 | 11,158 | Fc | 9 | 12,212 | Fc | 9 | 12909 | Fc | 9 |
| Singapore | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ ] = Official data
Fc = Calculated data
Hg = Hectogram
Source: FAOSTAT | © FAO Statistics Division 2011 | 05 August 2011
Table 7A. Area Harvested, in hectare
| Country | Rice yield per hectare | Rank | Country | Rice yield per hectare | Rank | |
| 1970 | 2006 | |||||
| India | 37,591,700 | 1 | India | 43,810,000 | 1 | |
| China | 33,107,861 | 2 | China | 29,201,190 | 2 | |
| Bangladesh | 9,912,800 | 3 | Indonesia | 11,786,400 | 3 | |
| Indonesia | 8,135,080 | 4 | Bangladesh | 10,579,000 | 4 | |
| Thailand | 6,854,000 | 5 | Thailand | 10,165,200 | 5 | |
| 1980 | 2007 | |||||
| India | 40,151,500 | 1 | India | 43,910,000 | 1 | |
| China | 34,482,470 | 2 | China | 29,179,116 | 2 | |
| Bangladesh | 10,308,900 | 3 | Indonesia | 12,147,600 | 3 | |
| Thailand | 9,200,080 | 4 | Thailand | 10,668,900 | 4 | |
| Indonesia | 9,005,070 | 5 | Bangladesh | 10,575,000 | 5 | |
| 1990 | 2008 | |||||
| India | 42,686,600 | 1 | India | 43,540,000 | 1 | |
| China | 33,518,967 | 2 | China | 29,493,292 | 2 | |
| Indonesia | 10,502,400 | 3 | Indonesia | 12,309,200 | 3 | |
| Bangladesh | 10,435,300 | 4 | Bangladesh | 11,280,000 | 4 | |
| Thailand | 8,791,890 | 5 | Thailand | 10,683,500 | 5 | |
| 2000 | 2009 | |||||
| India | 44,712,000 | 1 | India | 41,850,000 | 1 | |
| China | 30,301,500 | 2 | China | 29,881,590 | 2 | |
| Indonesia | 11,793,000 | 3 | Indonesia | 12,883,600 | 3 | |
| Bangladesh | 10,801,200 | 4 | Bangladesh | 11,354,000 | 4 | |
| Thailand | 9,891,200 | 5 | Thailand | 10,963,100 | 5 | |
| 2005 | ||||||
| India | 43,659,800 | 1 | ||||
| China | 29,116,400 | 2 | ||||
| Indonesia | 11,839,100 | 3 | ||||
| Bangladesh | 10,524,100 | 4 | ||||
| Thailand | 10,225,000 | 5 |
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor
Table 7B.Area Harvested, ASEAN
| ASEAN Country |
1970 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 1980 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 1990 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2000 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2005 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2006 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2007 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2008 (in tonnes) |
Rank | 2009 (in tonnes) |
Rank | |||||||||
| Indonesia | 8,135,080 | 1 | 9,005,070 | 2 | 10,502,400 | 1 | 11,793,000 | 1 | 11,839,100 | 1 | 11,786,400 | 1 | 12,147,600 | 1 | 12,309,200 | 1 | 12883600 | 1 | |||||||||
| Thailand | 6,854,000 | 2 | 9,200,080 | 1 | 8,791,890 | 2 | 9,891,200 | 2 | 10,225,000 | 2 | 10,165,200 | 2 | 10,668,900 | 2 | 10,683,500 | 2 | 10963100 | 2 | |||||||||
| Myanmar | 4,808,700 | 3 | 4,800,900 | 4 | 4,760,000 | 4 | 6,302,490 | 4 | 7,384,000 | 3 | 8,074,000 | 3 | 8,011,000 | 3 | 8,078,000 | 3 | 8000000 | 3 | |||||||||
| Viet Nam | 4,724,400 | 4 | 5,600,200 | 3 | 6,042,800 | 3 | 7,666,300 | 3 | 7,329,200 | 4 | 7,324,800 | 4 | 7,207,400 | 4 | 7,414,300 | 4 | 7440100 | 4 | |||||||||
| Philippines | 3,195,000 | 5 | 3,459,130 | 5 | 3,318,720 | 5 | 4,038,080 | 5 | 4,070,420 | 5 | 4,159,930 | 5 | 4,272,890 | 5 | 4,459,980 | 5 | 4532300 | 5 | |||||||||
| Cambodia | 2,399,000 | 6 | 1,440,000 | 6 | 1,855,000 | 6 | 1,903,160 | 6 | 2,414,500 | 6 | 2,516,420 | 6 | 2,566,000 | 6 | 2,613,360 | 6 | 2675000 | 6 | |||||||||
| Lao People's Democratic Republic | 664,693 | 8 | 732,050 | 7 | 650,300 | 8 | 719,370 | 7 | 736,020 | 7 | 795,545 | 7 | 781,243 | 7 | 825,350 | 7 | 872896 | 7 | |||||||||
| Malaysia | 704,767 | 7 | 716,800 | 8 | 680,647 | 7 | 698,700 | 8 | 676,200 | 8 | 645,000 | 8 | 673,242 | 8 | 656,062 | 8 | 672304 | 8 | |||||||||
| Brunei Darussalam | 3,456 | 9 | 1,991 | 9 | 600 | 9 | 460 | 9 | 975 | 9 | 895 | 9 | 1,355 | 9 | 1,148 | 9 | 1062 | 9 | |||||||||
| Singapore | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
* = Unofficial figure
[ ] = Official data
F = FAO estimate
Im = FAO data based on imputation methodology
M = Data not available
P = Provisional official data
Source: FAOSTAT | © FAO Statistics Division 2011 | 05 August 2011
Table 8. Share of Exports to GDP, Current Price, 2010 1/
| Type of Expenditure | Share (in million pesos) |
% Share |
| Exports | 3,133,507 | 34.8 |
| A. Exports of Goods | 2,259,876 | 25.1 |
| B. Exports of Services | 873,632 | 9.7 |
| GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT | 9,003,480 | 100.0 |
1/ New series
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board
Table 9. Export of Goods in Current Prices, Share by Commodity, 2010 1/
Unit in Percent
| 2010 | |
| TOTAL EXPORTS OF GOODS | 100.0 |
| Principal Exports of Goods | 78.2 |
| Electronic Components | 62.1 |
| Components/Devices (Semiconductors) | 47.5 |
| Electronic Data Processing | 10.9 |
| Office Equipment | 0.5 |
| Consumer Electronics | 0.6 |
| Telecommunication | 0.2 |
| Communication/Radar | 1.4 |
| Control Instrumentation | 0.1 |
| Medical/Industrial Instrumentation | 0.1 |
| Automotive Electronics | 0.8 |
| Principal Agricultural Products | 4.3 |
| Bananas, including Plantains, Fresh or Dried | 0.6 |
| Coconut Oil | 2.5 |
| Copra Oil Cake or Meal | 0.2 |
| Dessicated Coconut | 0.3 |
| Mango, Fresh or Dried | 0.1 |
| Pineapple and Pineapple Products | 0.5 |
| Sugar | 0.1 |
| Principal Fishery Products | 0.8 |
| Shrimps and Prawns | 0.1 |
| Tuna | 0.7 |
| Articles of Apparel and Clothing Accessories | 3.4 |
| Basketworks | 0.1 |
| Cathodes & Sections of Cathodes, of Refined Copper |
1.6 |
| Ignition Wiring Sets | 2.2 |
| Metal Components | 1.5 |
| Other Products Manufactured from Materials on Consignment Basis |
1.5 |
| Petroleum Products | 0.7 |
| Others | 21.8 |
1/ New series
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board
Table 10. Gross Value Added Ratio (GVAR),
Top Export Commodities and Agriculture Products, 2010 1/
| GVAR | |
| Top Exports of Goods | |
| 1. Components/Devices (Semiconductors) a/ | 0.203 |
| 2. Electronic Data Processing b/ | 0.143 |
| 3. Articles of Apparel and Clothing Accessories c/ |
0.396 |
| 4. Coconut oil d/ | 0.898 |
| 5. Ignition Wiring Sets e/ | 0.260 |
| Agriculture Products f/ | |
|
0.694 |
|
0.672 |
|
0.898 |
|
0.661 |
|
0.783 |
|
0.834 |
|
0.838 |
|
0.850 |
|
0.925 |
|
0.807 |
|
0.831 |
1/ New series
a/ GVAR from manufacturing sector under radio, television and communication equipment and apparatus
b/ GVAR from manufacturing sector under office, accounting and computing machinery
c/ GVAR from manufacturing sector under wearing apparel
d/ GVAR from agri agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing under coconut
e/ GVAR from manufacturing sector under electrical machinery and apparatus
f/ Subsectors from agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing
GVAR = Gross Value Added
____________________
Gross Output
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board
Table 11. Share of ASEAN countries to World exports
2000-2010
| Export Levels |
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
| Brunei | 3,903,000,000 | 3,640,000,000 | 3,702,000,000 | 4,421,000,000 | 5,057,000,000 | 6,249,000,000 | 7,636,103,000 | 7,667,972,000 | 10,297,000,000 | 7,203,000,000 | 9,150,000,000 |
| Cambodia | 1,389,000,000 | 1,499,567,000 | 1,923,000,000 | 2,118,000,000 | 2,798,000,000 | 3,091,500,000 | 3,692,380,000 | 4,088,480,000 | 4,708,010,000 | 4,301,840,000 | 5,030,000,000 |
| Indonesia | 65,403,000,000 | 57,361,000,000 | 59,166,000,000 | 64,108,000,000 | 70,766,610,000 | 86,996,064,000 | 103,527,000,000 | 118,013,000,000 | 139,606,000,000 | 119,646,000,000 | 158,200,000,000 |
| Laos | 330,000,000 | 319,510,000 | 300,610,000 | 335,470,000 | 363,340,000 | 553,080,000 | 882,030,000 | 922,690,000 | 1,091,900,000 | 1,005,300,000 | 1,550,000,000 |
| Malaysia | 98,229,000,000 | 88,005,000,000 | 94,058,000,000 | 104,705,263,000 | 126,510,613,000 | 140,980,000,000 | 160,675,882,000 | 176,211,267,000 | 199,515,580,000 | 157,433,087,000 | 198,800,758,113 |
| Mayanmar | 1,646,000,000 | 2,381,000,000 | 3,046,000,000 | 2,483,000,000 | 2,379,960,000 | 3,813,460,000 | 4,588,852,000 | 6,337,870,000 | 6,937,180,000 | 6,709,991,000 | 8,590,000,000 |
| Philippines | 39,783,000,000 | 32,664,000,000 | 35,208,000,000 | 36,231,000,000 | 39,680,520,000 | 41,254,683,000 | 47,410,117,000 | 50,465,711,000 | 49,077,540,000 | 38,435,802,000 | 51,432,000,000 |
| Singapore | 137,804,000,000 | 121,751,000,000 | 125,177,000,000 | 159,902,000,000 | 198,637,000,000 | 229,649,000,000 | 271,807,000,000 | 299,307,920,000 | 338,176,022,000 | 269,832,500,000 | 351,867,092,216 |
| Thailand | 69,057,000,000 | 64,968,000,000 | 68,108,000,000 | 80,323,600,000 | 96,248,200,000 | 110,936,420,000 | 129,721,710,000 | 153,867,440,000 | 177,777,630,000 | 152,422,240,000 | 195,319,100,000 |
| Vietnam | 14,483,000,000 | 15,029,000,000 | 16,706,000,000 | 20,149,300,000 | 26,485,000,000 | 32,442,000,000 | 39,826,200,000 | 48,561,000,000 | 62,685,000,000 | 57,096,329,971 | 72,192,000,000 |
Unit: In Percent
| 2000 | Rank | 2001 | Rank | 2002 | Rank | 2003 | Rank | 2004 | Rank | 2005 | Rank | 2006 | Rank | 2007 | Rank | 2008 | Rank | 2009 | Rank | 2010 | Rank | |
| World | 6,456,000,000,000 | 6,191,000,000,000 | 6,492,000,000,000 | 7,586,000,000,000 | 9,218,000,000,000 | 10,489,000,000,000 | 12,113,000,000,00 | 14,000,000,000,000 | 16,116,000,000,000 | 12,522,000,000,000 | 15,238,000,000,000 | |||||||||||
| Singapore | 2.13 | 1 | 1.97 | 1 | 1.93 | 1 | 2.11 | 1 | 2.15 | 1 | 2.19 | 1 | 2.24 | 1 | 2.14 | 1 | 2.10 | 1 | 2.15 | 1 | 2.31 | 1 |
| Malaysia | 1.52 | 2 | 1.42 | 2 | 1.45 | 2 | 1.38 | 2 | 1.37 | 2 | 1.34 | 2 | 1.33 | 2 | 1.26 | 2 | 1.24 | 2 | 1.26 | 2 | 1.30 | 2 |
| Thailand | 1.07 | 3 | 1.05 | 3 | 1.05 | 3 | 1.06 | 3 | 1.04 | 3 | 1.06 | 3 | 1.07 | 3 | 1.10 | 3 | 1.10 | 3 | 1.22 | 3 | 1.28 | 3 |
| Indonesia | 1.01 | 4 | 0.93 | 4 | 0.91 | 4 | 0.85 | 4 | 0.77 | 4 | 0.83 | 4 | 0.85 | 4 | 0.84 | 4 | 0.87 | 4 | 0.96 | 4 | 1.04 | 4 |
| Vietnam | 0.22 | 6 | 0.24 | 6 | 0.26 | 6 | 0.27 | 6 | 0.29 | 6 | 0.31 | 6 | 0.33 | 6 | 0.35 | 6 | 0.39 | 5 | 0.46 | 5 | 0.47 | 5 |
| Philippines | 0.62 | 5 | 0.53 | 5 | 0.54 | 5 | 0.48 | 5 | 0.43 | 5 | 0.39 | 5 | 0.39 | 5 | 0.36 | 5 | 0.30 | 6 | 0.31 | 6 | 0.34 | 6 |
| Brunei | 0.06 | 7 | 0.06 | 7 | 0.06 | 7 | 0.06 | 7 | 0.05 | 7 | 0.06 | 7 | 0.06 | 7 | 0.05 | 7 | 0.06 | 7 | 0.06 | 7 | 0.06 | 7 |
| Mayanmar | 0.03 | 8 | 0.04 | 8 | 0.05 | 8 | 0.03 | 8 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.04 | 8 | 0.04 | 8 | 0.05 | 8 | 0.04 | 8 | 0.05 | 8 | 0.06 | 8 |
| Cambodia | 0.02 | 9 | 0.02 | 9 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.03 | 8 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.03 | 9 | 0.03 | 9 |
| Laos | 0.01 | 10 | 0.01 | 10 | 0.00 | 10 | 0.00 | 10 | 0.00 | 10 | 0.01 | 10 | 0.01 | 10 | 0.01 | 10 | 0.01 | 10 | 0.01 | 10 | 0.01 | 10 |
Source: World Trade Organization. http://stat.wto.org/StatisticalProgram/WSDBStatProgramHome.aspx?Language=E
Table 12. Top 5 Country Destinations of Philippine Exports
(F.O.B. Value in Million U.S. Dollars)
| Country | Levels | Share (%) | Country | Levels | Share (%) | Country | Levels | Share (%) | Country | Levels | Share (%) | |||
| 1995 | 1999 | 2003 | 2007 | |||||||||||
| Total Export | 17,447 | 100.0 | Total Export | 35,037 | 100.0 | Total Export | 36,231 | 100.0 | Total Export | 50,466 | 100.0 | |||
| 1. United States of America 1/ | 6,160 | 35.3 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 10,445 | 29.8 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 7,263 | 20.1 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 8,594 | 17.0 | |||
| 2. Japan 2/ | 2,747 | 15.8 | 2. Japan 2/ | 4,664 | 13.3 | 2. Japan 2/ | 5,768 | 15.9 | 2. Japan 2/ | 7,304 | 14.5 | |||
| 3. Singapore | 996 | 5.7 | 3. Taiwan | 2,993 | 8.5 | 3. Hongkong | 3,094 | 8.5 | 3. Hong Kong | 5,804 | 11.5 | |||
| 4. United Kingdom of Great Britain | 923 | 5.3 | 4. Netherlands | 2,865 | 8.2 | 4. Netherlands | 2,922 | 8.1 | 4. China, People's Republic of | 5,750 | 11.4 | |||
| 5. Hongkong | 824 | 4.7 | 5. Singapore | 2,467 | 7.0 | 5. Taiwan | 2,492 | 6.9 | 5. Netherlands | 4,150 | 8.2 | |||
| 1996 | 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | |||||||||||
| Total Export | 20,543 | 100.0 | Total Export | 38,078 | 100.0 | Total Export | 39,681 | 100.0 | Total Export | 49,078 | 100.0 | |||
| 1. United States of America 1/ | 6,966 | 33.9 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 11,365 | 29.9 | 1. Japan 2/ | 7,982 | 20.1 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 8,207 | 16.7 | |||
| 2. Japan 2/ | 3,671 | 17.9 | 2. Japan 2/ | 5,609 | 14.7 | 2. United States of America 1/ | 7,088 | 17.9 | 2. Japan 2/ | 7,707 | 15.7 | |||
| 3. Singapore | 1,224 | 6.0 | 3. Singapore | 3,124 | 8.2 | 3. Netherlands | 3,583 | 9.0 | 3. China, People's Republic of | 5,469 | 11.1 | |||
| 4. Netherlands | 1,115 | 5.4 | 4. Netherlands | 2,982 | 7.8 | 4. Hongkong | 3,146 | 7.9 | 4. Hong Kong | 4,987 | 10.2 | |||
| 5. United Kingdom of Great Britain | 936 | 4.6 | 5. Taiwan | 2,861 | 7.5 | 5. China | 3,653 | 6.7 | 5. Netherlands | 3,708 | 7.6 | |||
| 1997 | 2001 | 2005 | 2009 | |||||||||||
| Total Export | 25,228 | 100.0 | Total Export | 32,150 | 100.0 | Total Export | 41,255 | 100.0 | Total Export | 38,436 | 100.0 | |||
| 1. United States of America 1/ | 8,815 | 34.9 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 8,980 | 27.9 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 7,418 | 18.0 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 6,789 | 17.7 | |||
| 2. Japan 2/ | 4,194 | 16.6 | 2. Japan 2/ | 5,057 | 15.7 | 2. Japan 2/ | 7,206 | 17.5 | 2. Japan 2/ | 6,208 | 16.2 | |||
| 3. Netherlands | 1,663 | 6.6 | 3. Netherlands | 2,976 | 9.3 | 3. China, People's Republic of | 4,077 | 9.9 | 3. Netherlands | 3,744 | 9.7 | |||
| 4. Singapore | 1,621 | 6.4 | 4. Singapore | 2,308 | 7.2 | 4. Netherlands | 4,033 | 9.8 | 4. Hong Kong | 3,213 | 8.4 | |||
| 5. Hongkong | 1,172 | 4.6 | 5. Taiwan | 2,127 | 6.6 | 5. Hong Kong | 3,341 | 8.1 | 5. China, People's Republic of | 2,934 | 7.6 | |||
| 1998 | 2002 | 2006 | 2010 | |||||||||||
| Total Export | 29,496 | 100.0 | Total Export | 35,208 | 100.0 | Total Export | 47,410 | 100.0 | Total Export | 51,393 | 100.0 | |||
| 1. United States of America 1/ | 10,098 | 34.2 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 8,683 | 24.7 | 1. United States of America 1/ | 8,690 | 18.3 | 1. Japan 2/ | 7,798 | 15.2 | |||
| 2. Japan 2/ | 4,234 | 14.4 | 2. Japan 2/ | 5,293 | 15.0 | 2. Japan 2/ | 7,918 | 16.7 | 2. United States of America 1/ | 7,557 | 14.7 | |||
| 3. Netherlands | 2,319 | 7.9 | 3. Netherlands | 3,055 | 8.7 | 3. Netherlands | 4,769 | 10.1 | 3. Singapore | 7,331 | 14.3 | |||
| 4. Singapore | 1,832 | 6.2 | 4. Taiwan | 2,485 | 7.1 | 4. China, People's Republic of | 4,628 | 9.8 | 4. China, People's Republic of | 5,701 | 11.1 | |||
| 5. Taiwan | 1,757 | 6.0 | 5. Singapore | 2,472 | 7.0 | 5. Hong Kong | 3,706 | 7.8 | 5. Hong Kong | 4,333 | 8.4 | |||
1/ includes Alaska and Hawaii
2/ includes Okinawa
Source: National Statistics Office http://census.gov.ph/data/sectordata/datafts.html
Posted: 08 August 2011.